I recently stumbled upon a wikepedia page that, in turn, dropped me off onto a page where author and editor Eric Flint discusses such things as the Baen free library, e-books, and the different philosophies and approaches to this new medium.
I wanted to write to him directly in regards to some comments he made about Harlan Ellison and those who would like to boycott his work because of his attitude towards the free library. I read through it and found myself chuckling, even though the content wasn’t specifically intended to be funny.
Eric made mention of the fact that one might as well refuse to read an author whose politics you didn’t like and that got me thinking. He mentioned David Weber and John Ringo as examples of conservative authors we liberals should possibly shun. Not that he suggested doing so.
Right now I’m listening to a book by Dean Koontz, the latest in a series I particularly enjoy. “Odd Hours” is the newest book in his Odd Thomas series, easily my SECOND favorite series he’s written. My first favorite is the Christopher Snow books, which I personally dub the “Moonlight Cove” series.
Now I know that my political opinions differ considerably from Mr. Koontz’s and, though he injects some of the conservative philosophy into his characters a little more than I like, I simply roll my eyes when I get to those parts and continue onward, thinking to myself that if he thinks THIS modern society is all that degraded, he must have studied the history of an alternate world of which I am unaware. If it seems that our cities and towns have a much higher percentage of lunatics and psychopaths than in previous ages, it’s partly because as the population grows, the percentages grow with it. It’s also partly because the career opportunities for psychos have been depleted over the past few centuries now that they can’t carve a place for themselves as warlords, pirates, and mercenary commanders and those that aren’t born wealthy must now primarily earn their survival as lawyers, diesel mechanics, grocery clerks, and other “regular” folks. Last but not least, we’ve gone from a media that didn’t share with us all the unsavory things our neighbors were up to to a media that ignores just about everything else.
The world is screwed up because it’s always been screwed up. No secret about that. I don’t want to listen to anyone else trying to convince us we’re in a handbasket heading for a hot place as if it’s somehow a new development.
So, please, don’t tell me how bad this world is, and how much evil there is in it. The only possible reply is “no shit.” But there’s a hell of a lot more people around who don’t think a public hanging’s a fun family event than there were even a hundred or so years ago. Selfishness, as sad as it is, doesn’t quite match up to casual cruelty as a yardstick of where we stand as a people. The guy who walks past a homeless person begging change may be self-absorbed and oblivious, but unless something provokes a mob scene during which everyone loses any sense of morality, he’s also not likely to kick the guy in the face and laugh at him as he lies bleeding on the sidewalk.
I know humanity has some problems. But anyone who believes we’re somehow debased compared to some mythical time in our past is suffering from delusions. Ask any peasant of medieval Europe, or any slave of the Romans, Vikings, or Colonial Americans. Ask any African American who was relegated to the back of the bus, or forced to use “colored only” drinking fountains. Ask any Native American lying under smallpox-infected blankets as he watches his people die around him.
Yeah, there are some serious shitheads in the world. But the majority of people are just trying to get by, trying to live the best life they know how. They don’t exist to inflict suffering on others, or take joy in seeing people suffer.
So, no. I don’t buy that line of reasoning at all. But do I think we could all do more to make the world a better place? Hell, yeah. And maybe someday soon someone will come around and explain how to go about it without all the world’s shitheads getting together to kick the crap out of him or her for daring to say so.
In the meantime, the world keeps turning and every day is a new chance to make a difference somewhere that really matters.
But I digress. Badly . My original point was that, according to Mr. Flint and several others, having a book available in the free library has increased the sales of the authors’ other books by a considerable margin. I can see where that might be the case. Now, of course, most of us can’t afford to give our books away. A few here or there, but not one of them to whoever wants it.
But I can, on the other hand, give my short stories away. And I do so fairly often. I have no deals to publish my stories, so they’re entirely mine to give away. Not the same as giving away a whole novel, perhaps, but the fact is that I probably do have enough short stories now to fill a book. Trouble is, most folks aren’t really into short stories anymore. The market’s changed that much.
Too bad, really. My wife says my short stories are even better than my novels. Ironic, considering I’m one of those people who don’t like reading shorts.
Weird, huh?
I think it’s great what Baen’s is doing. And I hope they continue doing it for years to come.
And, for the record, I agree with Eric Flint. Don’t boycott an author because you disagree with his or her stance on something. It’s not only silly, it’s self-defeating. Enjoy books for what they are if they’re entertaining, and set them aside if they’re not.
It’s really that simple.
Here’s a link to the article in question to which I’m referring.
http://www.baen.com/library/palaver8.htm